search

Cem Ilkel vs Jussi Tiainen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Tiainen analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Cem Ilkel vs Jussi Tiainen Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Tiainen

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.81% of points on their second serve, while Tiainen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.04% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tiainen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.26% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tiainen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.22% of matches played (W/L 20/ 31), with Tiainen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Tiainen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 5/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Tiainen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times and Tiainen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Tiainen winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Tiainen was at the Turkey F15 (Antalya), 17-04-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-0.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Tiainen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Tiainen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 1, and Tiainen 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.16 while Tiainen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tiainen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 40.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tiainen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Cem Ilkel

5

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

412

Rank

144

High

28

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

24

Age

Plays

Jussi Tiainen

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L L L W L L L L

Form

L W L L W L W L L L

56% (401-314)

Career Total W/L

30% (6-14)

38% (9-15)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$225,530

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Ilkel VS Tiainen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Cem Ilkel Jussi Tiainen
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 6
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Ilkel VS Tiainen H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(5) 6-0

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Cem Ilkel Jussi Tiainen
YTD W/L 38% (9/15) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 38% (20/33) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 44% (213/269) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 33% (4/8) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 45% (5/6) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.49 0
Aces Total 114 0
DFs per game 0.22 0
DFs Total 51 0
Avg Match Time 1:29:14 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 173.04 0
1st Serve % 57% (843/1469) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 69% (585/843) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 47% (293/626) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 40% (38/94) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 35% (487/1386) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/1) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 44% (7/9) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 29% (2/5) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 35% (8/23) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 83% (5/6) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 50% (3/6) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 70% (10/7) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 30% (10/3) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 14% (14/2) 0% (0/0)

Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 29 of 41)
1st Serve %
68% ( 38 of 56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83% ( 24 of 29)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 19 of 38)
75% ( 9 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
20% ( 8 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 28 of 56)
61
Total Points Won
36
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72% ( 63 of 88)
1st Serve %
50% ( 57 of 113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79% ( 50 of 63)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 39 of 57)
44% ( 11 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 27 of 56)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
31% ( 27 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 47 of 113)
108
Total Points Won
93
L
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69% ( 33 of 48)
1st Serve %
56% ( 38 of 68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
53% ( 8 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 14 of 30)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
29% ( 14 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 30 of 68)
64
Total Points Won
52
L
6-4 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve %
55% ( 24 of 44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79% ( 23 of 29)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
70% ( 7 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
23% ( 9 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 25 of 44)
55
Total Points Won
28
L
6-0 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64% ( 38 of 59)
1st Serve %
75% ( 46 of 61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76% ( 29 of 38)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 28 of 46)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 9 of 15)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
25% ( 15 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 24 of 61)
68
Total Points Won
52
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62% ( 40 of 65)
1st Serve %
57% ( 32 of 56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
44% ( 11 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 12 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
42% ( 27 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 25 of 56)
63
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 50 of 70)
1st Serve %
66% ( 49 of 74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74% ( 37 of 50)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 34 of 49)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
33% ( 23 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 29 of 74)
76
Total Points Won
68
L
1-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 36 of 51)
1st Serve %
51% ( 23 of 45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81% ( 29 of 36)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 17 of 23)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
24% ( 12 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 18 of 45)
57
Total Points Won
39
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47% ( 34 of 72)
1st Serve %
61% ( 39 of 64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82% ( 28 of 34)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 27 of 39)
50% ( 19 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 25 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 25 of 64)
72
Total Points Won
64
W
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
R1
cross
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve %
48% ( 19 of 40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 9 of 19)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 7 of 21)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
30% ( 13 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 24 of 40)
55
Total Points Won
29
L
6-0 6-2 H2H

Jussi Tiainen Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Patrik Hartmeier
Player
Jussi Tiainen
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve %
44% ( 28 of 64)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
12
77% ( 23 of 30)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 13 of 36)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
29% ( 14 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 34 of 64)
69
Total Points Won
44
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Jussi Tiainen
Player
Patrik Hartmeier
44% ( 28 of 64)
1st Serve %
61% ( 30 of 49)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
2
61% ( 17 of 28)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 23 of 30)
36% ( 13 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
63% ( 12 of 19)
0% ( 0 of 3)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
53% ( 34 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
29% ( 14 of 49)
44
Total Points Won
69
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Leevi Saatela
Player
Jussi Tiainen
58% ( 28 of 48)
1st Serve %
37% ( 22 of 59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
86% ( 24 of 28)
1st Serve Won
86% ( 19 of 22)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 15 of 37)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 10 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 25 of 59)
63
Total Points Won
44
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 2-6 7-6(5) H2H
Q1
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Aaron Prandstetter
Player
Jussi Tiainen
76% ( 44 of 58)
1st Serve %
43% ( 29 of 67)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68% ( 30 of 44)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 20 of 29)
50% ( 7 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 14 of 38)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
36% ( 21 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 33 of 67)
70
Total Points Won
55
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
W
6-3 3-6 6-2 H2H
Q2
L
6-1 6-1 H2H

Ilkel Vs Tiainen Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions